In this week’s discussion, we wrote about the collaborative nature of action research and best practices for implementing change.
Sharing the findings of your action research builds a culture of inquiry. It promotes feedback and reflection to generate new questions, provide new insights, and set the stage for ongoing continuous improvement.
Imagine you are presenting your action research proposal to a group of professional stakeholders who would need to support implementation of the plan. These stakeholders might be a leadership team, board, department, or group of colleagues.
In this assignment, you will create a 5- to 7-minute audiovisual presentation for the professional stakeholders from whom you would require collaboration to implement your plan.
Step 1
Review this module’s required readings and discussion board regarding the best ways to manage change and develop a culture of collaborative inquiry.
Step 2
Select a digital tool to create your narrated presentation with supporting slides or other visuals. See potential presentation tools in the ACE Digital Tools Center.
Create slides or other visuals to present your information. The video should include multimedia elements that engage the intended audience. Apply the tips from the “Writing Creative Presentation Scripts” video at the bottom of these directions.
A best practice is to compose a script or talking points to use while recording the narration.Consider your audience, purpose, and tone in crafting your message. You are not required to submit these speaking notes; they are just helpful for you to prepare for your presentation.
At a minimum, your video must include:
an introduction to the “why” behind the action research method;
persuasive, evidence-based arguments for the importance of the research proposal/problem;
specific data points, graphics, images, and/or multimedia elements to engage the audience and emphasize the main points;
information from the Proposed Action Plan (appendix from your Module 4 assignment), including the problem, research question, solution or intervention strategy, goal, target population, action steps, persons responsible, resources, and timelines;
potential benefits for stakeholders with evidence to support the predictions;
next steps; and
a list of APA-formatted references.
Cite at least three of your scholarly, peer-reviewed sources from your action research proposal paper in this video. The sources must be published within the past 5 years. Include a references list at the end.
Step 3
Practice and record your video.
Use the assignment rubric to informally assess your work and ensure you have met all requirements.
Step 4
Submit your audiovisual presentation using the appropriate assignment submission type (File Upload or Text Entry) for your product. ACE recommends Kaltura for submitting video assignments, regardless of the recording tool used. See the “Submit Kaltura Media to an Assignment” guide for a tutorial.
Presenting Your Action Research Proposal to a Professional Audience
Presenting Your Action Research Proposal to a Professional Audience
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication and Audiovisual Presentation Strategies
40 to >35.0 pts
Mastery
The video presents a persuasive argument for the importance of the research proposal and would garner buy-in from the intended professional stakeholder audience. The video includes specific data points, graphics, images, and/or multimedia elements to engage the audience and emphasize the main points. Visuals lead the viewer through the information and are not overcrowded with text. The verbal communication and tone are appropriate for the relevant, professional audience. The video and audio are clear.
35 to >25.0 pts
Proficient
The video presents an argument for the action research proposal. The video contains most of the assignment directions to include specific data points, graphics, images, and/or multimedia elements to engage the audience and emphasize the main points. Visuals lead the viewer through the information. The verbal communication and tone are mostly appropriate for the relevant, professional audience. The video and audio are clear.
25 to >17.0 pts
Marginal
The video most of the assignment requirements for specific data points, graphics, images, and/or multimedia elements to engage the audience and emphasize the main points. Visuals lead the viewer through the information. The verbal communication and tone are mostly appropriate for the relevant, professional audience. Video and audio quality are adequate but may be inconsistent.
17 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
The video is missing or does not meet the minimum length requirement. Has poor audio or video quality. The communication and/or presentation skills are inappropriate for the audience.
0 pts
No Submission
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVideo Content: Problem and Purpose
20 to >17.0 pts
Mastery
Problem and purpose statements are detailed. The audience understands the “why” behind the need for the action research and proposal. Explicit connections between the problem and purpose of the research are included and are supported by professional and credible sources.
17 to >14.0 pts
Proficient
Problem and purpose statements are included. Alignment between the problem and purpose of the research is evident and explained.
14 to >11.0 pts
Marginal
The problem and/or purpose statement is vague and needs revision to function as a clear foundation for action research, or there is a weak alignment between the problem and purpose of the action research.
11 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
The problem and/or purpose statement is missing, or there is a clear misalignment between the problem and purpose of the action research.
0 pts
No Submission
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVideo Content: Proposed Action Plan and Benefits
20 to >17.0 pts
Mastery
Proposed Action Plan is presented concisely in an easy-to-understand way. The plan includes the problem, research question, solution or intervention strategy, goal, target population, action steps, persons responsible, resources, timelines, and potential benefits for stakeholders.
17 to >14.0 pts
Proficient
Proposed Action Plan is presented. The plan includes the problem, research question, solution or intervention strategy, goal, target population, action steps, persons responsible, resources, timelines, and potential benefits for stakeholders.
14 to >11.0 pts
Marginal
More than two of the Action Research Plan elements are missing from the video presentation.
11 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Many or all of the Action Research Plan elements are missing from the video presentation.
0 pts
No Submission
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrating Research Applications in a Professional Context
10 to >8.5 pts
Mastery
Demonstrates an insightful understanding of the application and use of research in the professional field. Explicit connections between research and professional work are provided. References and citations indicate substantial research use, including 3 or more reference listings for current, scholarly, peer-reviewed sources. All sources are cited in the text and were published within the last 5 years.
8.5 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Demonstrates an adequate understanding of the application and use of research in a professional context. References and citations indicate use of research, including at least 2 sources that are related to the topic. The majority of sources are current (within the last 5 years) and from professional and credible publications or organizations.
7 to >5.5 pts
Marginal
Some understanding of research use is evident. Additional evidence and/or elaboration are needed to demonstrate an adequate understanding of the application and use of research in a professional context. References and citations indicate minimal research conducted with few (two or fewer) resources included. Sources are outdated or from non-professional or non-credible sources.
5.5 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
In-text citations and/or reference listings are missing or do not match, indicating inadequate research on the topic and/or minimal understanding of how to apply and use research in education professions.
0 pts
No Submission
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format and Writing Mechanics
10 to >8.5 pts
Mastery
Submission is free of spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors. Submission is well-formatted and professional. APA-format accurate for in-text citations and references.
8.5 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Submission contains minimal spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors that do not impede the understanding of the concepts and plans. APA format is mostly accurate for in-text citations and references.
7 to >5.5 pts
Marginal
Submission contains multiple spelling, formatting, and/or grammatical errors. Some ideas are unclear due to errors in writing mechanics, or multiple elements of APA format are not followed.
5.5 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Submission contains extensive spelling, formatting, and grammatical errors that significantly impede the understanding and presentation of ideas.
0 pts
No Submission
10 pts
Total Points: 100
