Written Portion 100 points-Create a one-page IRAC on International Business Law case. Describe how the case was supported, not supported, overturned, etc., by the international law. Identify what laws were involved. Your summary is structured by 3 pages; An APA student title page (1), one page single-spaced content for your written portion, headings (centered) on each section of your content, and include a conclusion (second page). On the final page (third page) should be an APA reference page. All pages should have page numbers.
PowerPoint Presentation (PPT) Portion 100 points-Your PPT should be 7 slides in total of the information extracted from your written paper. A title slide (1), 5 slides with content on it using the 5×5 ruleLinks to an external site. or the 7x7Links to an external site. rule. This rule of threeLinks to an external site. will also describe another option to communicating through PowerPoint. Incorporate recorded (voice and camera/face) voice-over within Studio, PowerPoints voice, or other voice-over video option to present your IRAC findings.
Criteria
Does Not Meet Criterion (0.00-1.00)
Approaches Criterion (1.01-2.00)
Meets Criterion (2.01-3.00)
Exceeds Criterion (3.01-4.00)
Criterion: Creates a well develop comparison and contrast change approach to both organization, community, social or communicated issue, problem or need. The storyboard provides the theoretical foundation, assesses the environment and describes appropriate steps to implement change from chapter 1, 2,3.
Weight: 70%
The explanation of the relationship of literature to current topic; explanation is lacking.
Literature chapter 1, 2,3.
review has brief reference to key theoretical literature and seminal studies. Very narrowly focus and subtopics too specific or too broad. Literature review supporting subtopics is inadequate.
Provides some explanation of relationship of literature to current topic is provided.
Literature review has some reference to key theoretical material seminal studies. Several subtopics are examined and most subtopics are appropriate.
Provides solid explanation of literature’s relationship to current topic is provided. Literature review has good reference to key theoretical literature and seminal studies. Presentation of appropriate subtopics inherent in research with supporting literature.
Demonstrates explicit relationship between relevant literature and current topic is demonstrated.
Literature review is explicit making thorough reference to key theoretical material and important seminal studies. Subtopics are thoroughly and appropriately presented through relevant and sufficient literature.
Criterion:
Quality of written communication with use of APA Format/Style Edition APA Format
Weight: 30%
No organization, sequencing, or structure in visual presentation and/or written communication.
The storyboard has inconsistent grammar, spelling and inability to explain findings clearly. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. APA format and style are not evident
Weakly organized with no logical sequencing or structure in visual presentation and/or written communication.
The storyboard has frequent and repetitive errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced.
Well organized, demonstrates logical sequencing and structure in visual presentation and/or written communication.
The storyboard has some errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.
All key elements of an APA are present; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors.
Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style
Exceptionally well organized, demonstrates logical sequencing and structure in visual presentation and/or written communication.
The storyboard is free of mechanical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. A broad understanding of APA format and style is evident.
Accurate citations and references are presented.
No APA errors are evident.
PPT:
Criteria
Does Not Meet Criterion (0.00-1.00)
Approaches Criterion
(1.01-2.00)
Meets Criterion
(2.01-3.00)
Exceeds Criterion
(3.01-4.00)
Criterion: Demonstrate effective verbal and nonverbal skills in group settings: Non Verbal: Eye Contact Body Language & Poise. Weight: 50%
Student fails to engage in eye contact with audience.
Student engages in little eye contact with audience.
Student displays some eye contact with audience.
Student engages in full eye contact on consistent basis with audience.
Criterion: Demonstrate effective verbal and nonverbal skills in group settings: Main Points of Presentation Verbal: Use of Voice & Pronunciation of Terms Weight: 50%
None of the major points of presentation are clear, supported, or organized.
A few major points of presentation are clearly identified, though with minimal support and organization.
Most major points are clearly presented, well-supported, and sufficiently organized.
All major points are skillfully and effectively presented.
