Refer to the attached “Assessing Impact on Student Learning Scenario” for information about a class and individual students, the lesson plan that was used, the multiple ways students were assessed, and the results of those assessments.
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).
Pre-Assessment
A. Analyze the student pre-assessment results from the scenario by doing the following:
1. Discuss an area of strength (i.e., skill area, question type, student subset) and how it is supported by the data.
2. Discuss a potential problem area (i.e., skill area, question type, student subset) and how it is supported by the data.
B. Using your analysis from part A, recommend an adjustment to the “Anticipatory Set” section of the lesson plan from the scenario.
Informal Formative Assessment
C. Analyze the student results from the informal formative assessment from the scenario by doing the following:
1. Discuss an area of strength and how it is supported by the data.
2. Discuss a problem area and how it is supported by the data.
D. Compare the results of the pre-assessment to the results of the informal formative assessment for the following:
• the class as a whole
• a student who demonstrated growth
• a student who did not demonstrate growth
1. Describe the feedback you would provide to the class and each identified student in part D regarding their progress after the informal formative assessment. The feedback provided should be specific, appropriate, and meaningful as well as aligned with the data.
Summative Assessment
E. Analyze the student summative assessment results from the scenario by doing the following:
1. Discuss an area of strength and how it is supported by the data.
2. Discuss a remaining problem area and how it is supported by the data.
3. Discuss two possible causes of nonproficiency for students in certain areas after the summative assessment.
F. Compare the results of the pre-assessment to the results of the summative assessment for the following:
• the class as a whole
• a student who demonstrated growth
• a student who did not demonstrate growth
1. Describe the feedback you would provide to the class and each identified student from part F regarding their results after the summative assessment. The feedback provided should be specific, appropriate, meaningful, and aligned with the data.
G. Using your analyses from part E, select any two of the following components of the lesson plan from the scenario and recommend one adjustment for each:
• Presentation Procedures for New Information and/or Modeling
• Guided Practice
• Independent Student Practice
• Culminating or Closing Procedure/Activity
• Differentiated Instruction
• Assessment
1. Discuss your rationale for how each recommendation from part G would improve instructional effectiveness or support student learning.
H. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
I. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
