The Ideas in Your Analysis Post
You should post the following with your original analysis:
Your name
Learning Question
Two Claim Triangles, each includes:
Setting description
Interpretation of learning goal
Data
Theory
Claim
Big Idea
Creative Element
You are also responsible for replying to at least two other students’ analyses.
Summarize the big idea from the original analysis.
Summarize a related (new) theory from a reading/watching/listening
State the theorists’ name.
Summarize in one sentence their big idea.
State how this big idea relates to data in the original analysis.
State how this other theory adds perspective to the original analysis.
Before you even start on your final project, through your weekly HW and LC tasks you will have completed everything except the last task.
Please note, you should only use the following theory from what we’ve read/listened/watched this term:
Readings: Rogoff, Annamma, Baines, Ramsey, Vygotsky, Bang
Watchings: Boroditsky, Tanner, Nasir, Rogoff
Listenings: Clever Apes (Bang), Invisibilia, NPR Chores (Rogoff)
The rubric is included on this page. The rubric grades this out of 100 points. The assignment however is worth 20 points. Consider the rubric the percentage score, while the 20 points is what it contributes to your total score. For example, if you earn 80% on the rubric, you contribute 16 points to your final grade.
Learning Question
view longer description
15 pts
Full Marks
The learning question is clearly stated and shown in large text on the screen. The question is read slowly and clearly for the audience.
9 pts
Developing
The learning question is presented but either the text is too small or the reading of the question is difficult to hear.
0 pts
No Marks
The learning question is missing.
/ 15 pts
Claim Triangles
view longer description
20 pts
Full Marks
There are two claim triangles. Each claim is connected to evidence from the data and theory that interprets the evidence. In 60 seconds or less the individual described both claim triangle of claim, data, theory.
10 pts
Developing
There are two claim triangles but some parts of the claim triangle are missing or unclear.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing one or both claim triangles.
/ 20 pts
Big Idea
view longer description
15 pts
Full Marks
There is a big idea that takes a position on what in the learning setting supports equitable, inclusive, anti-racist, and affirming spaces for young people, OR how the learning setting could change to better meet these goals. The idea connects to the person’s learning question and claim triangles.
7.5 pts
Developing
The is a big idea, but it is missing connections to either their learning question, claim triangles, or how the setting(s) is or could be equitable, inclusive, anti-racist, and affirming for young people.
0 pts
No Marks
Big idea missing.
/ 15 pts
Claim Triangles are supported by theory/course big ideas (Theory)
view longer description
10 pts
Full Marks
When the individual presented their claim triangles, the names of theories were stated, there was a summary in the analysts’ own words about that idea, and there was a statement about why the idea was appropriate to interpret the data.
5 pts
Developing
Some piece of the connection to theory was missing. For instance, the analysts did not include a summary in their own words to describe the idea, or the analysts did not justify why the theory was appropriate for interpreting the data.
0 pts
No Marks
No clear connection to theory was presented.
/ 10 pts
Claim Triangles are supported by Observational Evidence (Data)
view longer description
10 pts
Full Marks
When the individual presented their claim triangles, they clearly connected the theories/big ideas to evidence from one or more NWQ they completed during an observation.
5 pts
Full Marks
When the individual presented their claim triangles, almost every time they connected the theories/big ideas to evidence from one or more NWQ they completed during an observation.
0 pts
No Marks
The individual did not make clear connections to data collected with NWQ tools.
/ 10 pts
Claims include the following
view longer description
10 pts
Full Marks
When the individual presented their claim triangles, they included a description of their observation setting, their understanding of the setting’s learning goal, and a claim about how the setting did or did not support learners to draw on their histories, cultures, and identities.
5 pts
Developing
When the individual presented their individual claim triangles, most included a description of their observation setting, some of the individuals included their understanding of the setting’s learning goal, and some of them included a description of their observation setting, their understanding of the setting’s learning goal, and a claim about how the setting did or did not support learners to draw on their histories, cultures, and identities.
0 pts
No Marks
No description of the setting was included and no claim about supporting learners to draw on their histories, cultures, and identities.
/ 10 pts
Creative Element
view longer description
10 pts
Full Marks
Creative element included with a description of how it connects to their Big Idea.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
/ 10 pts
Feedback to peers
10 pts
Full (and Bonus) Marks
Full (10 points) Individual responded to at least 2 other people’s final projects. These contributions were substantial.
5 pts
Developing
The individual posted on at least one other person’s final project.
0 pts
No Marks
No feedback provided to other’s final projects.
/ 10 pts
