You can not define autonomyYou can not define working for the good of the patient and avoiding harm without defining what good means and avoiding harm means. Vivian received more resources or did she really? Was there anything lacking. There is a reason we discussed why Vivian keeps referring to the same poem and has a copy by her bedside. She refers to thinking about death in the abstract in teaching the poem but now she is facing death. You can not get into defining distributive justice without getting into the idea of the different ways one can see distribution of goods (resources) and the question: should a volunteer research participant receive additional resources? If the Principle is rated as a 2 I will find three negative supporting examples.The example connects to the definition. Giving a two sentence example such as Suzzie was the only one to look out for Vivian’s good is shallow. What did she do and how is she different from other personnel? It requires examples, specific people and a contrast. If Vivian received additional resources and it is fair, I need to know what resources and at least two reasons that are explained why you can give one person more resources than another. I am obviously not being egalitarian. Are there community values involved in rewarding a person who puts their life at risk for the benefit of all? All of society benefits if we discover a cure for stage four cancer. The person who volunteers takes on immense suffering. Should that be compensated? Your conclusion is an average of your scores. You need to pull information from the body of the paper to show how the examples you used
