There are two questions you have to answer. The first one is a short answer, which can only be seven sentences maximum referring to number _, and the second one is “essay form,” which has to be a maximum of 550 words and a minimum of 515 word referring to number_.
Both have to be based on the sources I attach only and nothing else only the powerpoints and reading I attach if it is anything external my professor fails me for plagiarism. The last source you can use is the book if you have access to it if not just the things I attached Reason & Religious Belief An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion By Michael L. Peterson, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach, David Basinger
For the short answer question, I am looking for five facts9 from my course material that are pertinent, clear,
specific, accurate, and distinct.10 You get two points for each such fact that is contained within one or more
complete (not run-on) sentences, for a maximum total of ten points. If you state a fact that is partially but
not crucially lacking in one or more of the aforementioned qualities, you still can receive one point for that
fact. If you want, you can number your sentences to ensure that you write no more than seven for each
question.
For the essay question, you can receive a maximum of eight points for summary and seven points for
evaluation. Your total possible maximum score on the summary and/or evaluation will be reduced by two
points for each part of an essay question that you do not attempt to answer.11 To save time, you can omit
general introductory and concluding paragraphs, and just dive right into your summary.
Number 1. Short answer question Short Answer (answer either Question 6 or 7, but not both): Provide the four steps of the formal version of the Problem of Evil (providing the wording of the steps is fine, without any further explanation). Then, explain the difference between “natural evil” and “moral evil” (no need to provide examples of either). DO not exceed 7 sentences
Number 2. Essay question Essay (answer either Question 8 or 9, but not both): Explain the preliminary idea and three steps of the Fine-Tuning Version of the Teleological Argument, as presented by William Lane Craig. For full credit, be sure to define fine-tuning when stating the preliminary idea, provide a bit of the rationale behind the second step, and describe the particular kind of God that the third step arrives at. Do you think that this version of the Teleological Argument—and Teleological Arguments for God’s existence in general—succeed? Explain. do not exceed 550 words and do not wrote below 515 words.
View keyboard shortcuts
for number 1 the sources are powerpoint13_3910.pptx attached in files.
it is and for number 2 the sources are powerpoint8_3910.pptx and csa_moralargument.pdf both attached in files.
