Each of the four analysis seminars in this course invites you to use a different tool of analysis commonly used by art historians and critics as we explore our topics. In this final seminar, we go beyond formal analysis, the historical moment, and iconology to utilize a comparative method to understand the often subtle shifts and changes in a similar art form because of different time periods, cultures or places.
Choose two works, one each from any two different historical eras we covered over this week (Ch. 31, 1850 to 1900 CE; and Ch. 32, 1900-1950 CE, and Ch. 33, 1950-2000 CE). Both works should be of the same form, i.e. two paintings, two sculptures, two buildings, two design works, etc. The works can be chosen from your textbook, readings or from your own independent online research. They should be at least 50 years apart in time.
Your report should include:
1. Images: Post images or links to your two chosen works, with the APA citation and URL to the sources.
2. Material Data: Name the artist/designer (if known), date(s), current location or museum, materials used and size. Note its use(s) and any special production techniques utilized.
3. Compare and Contrast: Compare and contrast the two chosen works using formal analysis, historical context, iconography to note their similarities and differences. A significant focus should be on what changed stylistically between the time/place of the earlier work, compared to the time/place the later work. Why was there this change? Note that if you are looking at works of architecture, make sure to examine the work both inside and out looking at many images of the work. This section should be at least 400 words.
4. Personal Reflections: Why did you choose these works? What are their least and most attractive aspects to you?
5. APA citations to your research sources.
