Please list the minimum of four resources from which you gathered the information to compose this project on the reference slide of your PowerPoint presentation.
Grading Information
This assignment is worth 100 points and graded according to the rubric. This assignment will be graded within a week after the due date and scores are then entered into the Canvas grade book.
Rubric
Research Project PowerPoint Presentation
Research Project PowerPoint Presentation
USE THIS SLIDE TEMPLATE: https://slidesgo.com/theme/science-subject-for-middle-school-chemical-elements#search-science&position-18&results-954&rs=search
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Project Question/ Objective
(Main question this research project will answer or explore)
15 to >12.0 pts
Exceeds expectations
The research question/objective was distinctly stated. Content is accurate and all required information is presented in a logical order.
12 to >9.0 pts
Meets expectations
The research question/objective was clearly stated. Content is accurate but some required information is missing and/or not presented in a logical order but is still generally easy to follow.
9 to >6.0 pts
Somewhat Meets Expectations
The research question/objective was clearly stated. Content is accurate but some required information is missing and/or not presented in a logical order, making it difficult to follow.
6 to >3.0 pts
Below Expectations
The research question/objective was not clearly stated. Content is questionable. Information is not presented in a logical order, making it difficult to follow.
3 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
The research question/objective was missing. Content is inaccurate. Information is not presented in a logical order, making it difficult to follow.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology
(Steps taken to explore research topic or answer research question)
15 to >12.0 pts
Exceeds expectations
The study design or procedures were described clearly, to include an appropriate rational for why the approach was selected. Detailed explanation of process used to compose project.
12 to >9.0 pts
Meets Expectations
The study design or procedures were described clearly. Clear explanation of process used to compose project.
9 to >6.0 pts
Somewhat Meets Expectations
The study design or procedures were provided. However, it lacked key information to understand what was done. Lack of explanation of key process used to compose project.
6 to >3.0 pts
Below expectations:
There was some discussion of the study design or procedures. Some explanation of process used to compose project.
3 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
There was no discussion of the study design or procedures. No explanation of process used to compose project.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults/Anticipated Results
Explanation of Project
15 to >12.0 pts
Exceeds expectations
The results/anticipated results were substantial and sufficiently addresses the research question/objective. Substantial explanation of project.
12 to >9.0 pts
Meets expectations
There was a clear presentation of results/anticipated results. Project was clearly explained.
9 to >6.0 pts
Somewhat meets expectations:
The results/anticipated results were discussed, but presentation of data was not clear. Project was not clearly explained.
6 to >3.0 pts
Below expectations
There was some discussion of the results/anticipated results. Some explanation of project.
3 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
There was no discussion of the results/anticipated results. No explanation of project.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion/ Conclusion
15 to >12.0 pts
Exceeds expectations
The discussion/conclusion was presented with a substantial connection to the research question/objective.
12 to >9.0 pts
Meets expectations
The discussion/conclusion was presented, with a clear connection to the research question/objective.
9 to >6.0 pts
Somewhat meets expectations:
The discussion/conclusion was presented, with a little connection to the research question/objective.
6 to >3.0 pts
Below expectations
There was minimal discussion/conclusion.
3 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
There was no discussion/ conclusion.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
15 to >12.0 pts
Exceeds expectations
No spelling errors. No grammar errors. Text is in authors’ own words.
12 to >9.0 pts
Meets expectations:
Few spelling errors. Few grammar errors. Text is in authors’ own words.
9 to >6.0 pts
Somewhat meets expectations:
Some spelling errors. Some grammar errors. Text is in authors’ own words.
6 to >3.0 pts
Below expectations
Some spelling errors. Some grammar errors. Most of text is in authors’ own words.
3 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
Many spelling and or grammar errors. Text is copied.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint Presentation
(Slide design, flow, etc.)
25 to >20.0 pts
Exceeds expectations
The content was clearly presented, and easy to follow. Images are appropriate. Layout is pleasing to the eye.
20 to >15.0 pts
Meets expectations
The content was presented correctly and flows well. Images are appropriate. Layout is cluttered.
15 to >10.0 pts
Somewhat meets expectations:
Appropriate content was provided, but not organized well. Most images are appropriate.
10 to >5.0 pts
Below expectations
The content provided is limited and does not improve understanding of the project. Images are inappropriate.
5 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
The content is poorly laid out, and the text is difficult to read mistakes. No images
25 pts
Total Points: 100
