Merger and acquisition (M&A) is important with investors because it influences seriously on shareholder value and market dynamics. This analysis sum up studies on stock market reactions to M&A announcements through short-term and long-term effects, factors influencing market reactions, theoretical frameworks, and gaps in existing literature.
M&A announcements often cause significant short-term fluctuations in stock prices, the long-term effects was influenced by many factors such as successful integration, realization of synergies, strategic fit, and broader market conditions. Investors and analysts watch carefully these growth to evaluate the ultimate impact on shareholder value.
The stock market reactions to M&A announcements are influenced by many issues, such as the perceived synergies, premium paid, financial strength, integration risks, regulatory considerations, and strategic rationale. Positive market reactions are usually happen because of factors such as anticipated synergies, strategic fit, and financial strength. Opposite with it, negative reactions may come from concerns about integration risks, overpayment, dilution, regulatory hurdles, and strategic misfit.
In the financial analysis, to study stock market reactions to M&A announcements, several theoretical frameworks are commonly used to give a form for understanding the market movements and the factors influencing investor behavior during M&A events. Here are some of the theoretical frameworks often utilized in such analyses:
1. Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH): In the context of M&A announcements, the EMH framework is used to determine whether stock prices immediately fix to reflect the new information regarding the merger or acquisition, or if there are delays or inefficiencies in the market’s response.
2. Event Study Methodology: This framework involves analyzing the impact of specific events (such as M&A announcements) on stock prices and helps researchers determine whether M&A announcements result in significant abnormal returns for acquiring and target firms, as well as for the overall market.
3. Information Asymmetry Theory: In the context of M&A announcements, this theory suggests that investors may react differently based on their assessment of the information conveyed by the announcement, leading to variations in stock prices.
While the existing literature on analyzing stock market reactions to M&A announcements is huge, several important gaps guarantee further research and exploration:
1. Long-Term Performance Assessment: Missing identify the long-term performance because of too focus on the short term may lead to the uncompleted research. The research that examine the sustainability of the market reactions and the actual value creation (or destruction) over an extended period following the completion of M&A transactions would be significant.
2. Cross-Country and Cross-Industry Comparisons: cross-country and cross-industry comparisons is necessary to understand how cultural, regulatory, and industry-specific factors influence market reactions to M&A announcements. Such comparative analyses can provide insights into the generalizability of findings and identify variations in market responses across different contexts.
Identifying these gaps in the existing literature can share more overall understanding of market movements and mergers, giving valuable insights for investors, policymakers, and corporate decision-makers alike.
Require: need some edits or fix it and link some sources
