Upload your evaluation of the scholarly articles or other relevant and trustworthy readings. The Google Scholar should be used for searching. https://scholar.google.com/ (writer can choose article from https://scholar.google.com/ topic must be related to sustainability and social responsibility topic.)
The articles may be purely conceptual or empirical. It is best to review scholarly articles published in peer-reviewed journals. The article readings should be at least four pages long and have references at the end.
IMPORTANT: Provide the full reference citation to identify the document source used (also the specific URL if online). Please provide detailed responses.
1. Is the title appropriate? Yes/No/Explain why (Overly broad/Too long/Interesting/Relevant/Too technical/Obscure/etc.)
2. Is the article theoretical, empirical, or both? Theoretical/Empirical/Both/Practitioner oriented
3. Does the article include: an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion, and references? Yes/List any missing item(s)
4. Does the article introduce the problem or new concepts that will be presented? Clear/Unclear introduction
5. Does the article address problems of significant concern to sustainability and/or social responsibility? Highly significant/Somewhat significant/Not significant
6. List three important facts from the literature review that the author(s) use(s) to support the main idea(s) of their article. 1-, 2-, 3-, or lacks objective reasoning/uses biased or unreliable sources
7. Are there any propositions or hypotheses? Yes/No If so, how many? Number___________.
8. If yes, then are propositions or hypotheses logically derived from the theory or conceptual framework? All logically derived/Some logically derived/None logically derived/No propositions/hypotheses
9. Was the sample size sufficient? Yes/No/No sample size mentioned If not, then it should have been about ____.
10. Did the author(s) draw correct conclusions from the study/sample/analysis of their research intentions/hypotheses? Yes, all correct/Yes, some correct/No, all wrong/No hypotheses were tested/Not applicable
11. Was the discussion supported by appropriate statistical analysis? Based on statistics analysis/Purely conjectural/Not applicable
12. List any examples of bias or faulty reasoning that you found in the article. Free of bias and supported by reliable sources/Speculative reasoning/Biased use of sources/Promoting a perspective
13. What information or ideas discussed in this article are also considered in your textbook and/or presented in this class? 1-, 2-, 3-, or All-new information
14. Managerial implications of the findings? Yes, practical use(s)/Limited application(s)/Not actionable
15. Did the article make a significant contribution to sustainability and/or social responsibility literature/fields? Very significant/Somewhat significant/Not at all significant/Can not determine
16. Your opinion/analysis/critique. Open-ended presentation
