Chapter 8 introduced you to the laws governing interviewing criminal suspects and the use of their statements as evidence of their crimes. Read the following questions and post your responses to the discussion board.
Why was the Miranda rule created by the United States Supreme Court? Is this rule truly necessary if the Due Process Clause of the Constitution protects individuals against the police coercing confessions? What do you think?
Chapter 9 explored various pre-trial identification procedures used by law enforcement in the criminal justice system as well as the use of certain DNA evidence. Read the following questions and post your responses to the discussion board.
Many states have adopted laws which require offenders, as well as arrestees, to submit DNA samples (i.e., cheek cell swabs). Do you believe that this is appropriate? If so, in which cases should it be required?
Discuss the ruling in Melendez v. Massachusetts. Do you think it is necessary to require cross examination of forensic lab technicians to allow their certificate of analysis to be admitted as evidence in a criminal prosecution?
The exclusionary rule was a major focus of Chapter 10. In light of your reading, review the questions below and respond with your thoughts and opinions to the discussion board.
Do you agree with the exclusionary rule? Why or why not?