Assignment Summary – You will analyze and answer questions over an historical issue from the first half of U.S. History. Students will compare two opposing perspectives. Topic and sources are provided for this assignment. The subject you’ll investigate involves interpreting the Constitution and the power of the federal government to create a national bank. Relevant topics both then as well as today.
Instructions – Everything needed to complete this assignment is right here. The information you will read is found in attached Interpreting the Constitution pdf above. The questions you’ll answer are below. You can do additional research on the topic if you want; however the majority of information in your answers must come from the source provided.
Paper Format – Paper must be a minimum of 500 content words (“content words” is defined as words that answer questions, not words from the questions themself). It should be typed using Word, or a word processor that can be converted to PDF, in Times New Roman 11 font, and double-spaced. Papers are to follow the format of questions then answers. Those that don’t will be penalized. See “Sample Format” section below for more information.
Works Cited, Copying, & Late Paper Policy – The end of your paper needs a Works Cited in which the source(s) used are listed (Format is the Chicago Manuel of Style). Information to cite the source you read is located on the last page of the Interpreting the Constitution document.
Plagiarism Policy and Punishment – Refer to the SJCD Student Handbook for policies/procedures on Plagiarism and Cheating.
Late Paper Policy – Because assignment is available for an extended period of time, no late papers will be accepted. If something of a catastrophic nature occurs that prevents completion, the student needs to contact the instructor promptly so an alternative schedule can be arranged.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS
Part I. Introduction
i. Describe in general the issue being debated.
Part II. Historical Debate
ii. What is the main argument in each perspective? On what points do they agree or disagree?
iii. What types of evidence do the authors use and does that evidence support their thesis?
Part III. Conclusion
iv. How did your reading(s) change the way you understood the subject?
v. How are the issues presented in your readings still relevant to you today? Please explain how your personal background and life experiences might influence your perspective on this topic.
vi. Imagine you have been asked to tackle a current national or global issue, how would you use what you’ve learned to help you do so?
