Essay question: Some scholars have argued that “the concept of [hegemonic] masculinity is flawed because it essentializes the character of men or imposes a false unity on a fluid and contradictory reality” (Connell & Messerschmidt 2005: 836). What is hegemonic masculinity, how has it been useful in understanding gender relations, and what, if any, are its limitations? You also might like to include an example, such as ‘men’s rights “activism”, the Proud Boys, or the backlash over greater female representation in politics, film and sport to support your claims. The major essay will be assessed according to the following criteria:
The complexity and clarity of your argument pertaining to the social construct of gender The application of relevant theories from the course The structure of your essay (ie a clear, concise and informative introduction stating your aims and approach, a logical ordering of ideas which towards a clear statement, and a conclusion which sufficiently summarises your argument.
The demonstration of independent research to locate at least 6 peer reviewed sources in addition to the relevant set readings from the course. The citation of references using the Harvard referencing style The clarity of your writing style. NOTE: It is perfectly acceptable to supplement peer-reviewed sources with other materials (such as blog posts, newspaper articles, advertisements, etc.).
You need to discriminate between how you are using these sources—you can use non-peer-reviewed material as evidence of how something is represented, for example, but not as factual evidence in support of your argument. If possible page numbers in the in text citations. I have uploaded articles and readings. Please use one reference for each.
