Make 2 Peer Responses These should be substantial and provide new information and ideas.
peer response 1
Hello everyone, this is the right discussion post lol.
A literature review serves as the foundation for high-quality medical education research, ensuring relevance, originality, generalizability, and impact. A literature review establishes context, educates technique, promotes creativity, eliminates duplication of effort, and ensures that professional standards are fulfilled. Iterative literature reviews require time and should be done throughout the study process. Human resources (librarians, colleagues), search tools (databases/search engines), and current literature should all be utilized to the fullest extent possible (related articles). It’s crucial to be organized (Maggio et al., 2016).
The four types of reviews are narrative, integrative, meta-analysis, and systemic. Narrative reviews are the most traditional, yet most familiar type of review (Schmidt & Brown, 2019). They are subjective, and writers are not concerned with various research methods, designs, or settings. An example of these is in trade publications (Schmidt & Brown, 2019). Integrative reviews, which we are most familiar with, are scholarly papers that synthesize published studies and articles to answer the big questions. They are peer-reviewed which clarifies the steps of conducting integrative reviews in nursing(Schmidt & Brown, 2019). Meta-analyses combine study results into a measurable format and estimate the proposed interventions. Multiple studies combined may result in a beneficial intervention (Schmidt & Brown, 2019). The final review is systemic, which combines the three reviews mentioned previously, addressing the same clinical issue (Schmidt & Brown, 2019). This particular type of review is most beneficial when evidence is needed right away.
Maggio, L. A., Sewell, J. L., & Artino, A. R. (2016, July). The Literature Review: A Foundation for high-Quality Medical Education Research. Journal of graduate medical education. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936839/.
Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2019). Evidence-based practice for nurses: appraisal and application of research (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
peer responce 2
A literature review is an overview of a published work on a specific topic. It can refer to a scholarly work or a portion of a scholarly work like a book, paper or article. A literature review is a research and evaluation of the chosen topic. Literature review is an evaluation of the main point, most significant and or relevant research reports that surveys books, organizes critique of scholarly work and supports the main points in the research process that provides relevant works written. The main points are to assist in providing the foundation or knowledge on the topic, point out the need for furthermore research, identify the relevance of works, and identify inconsistencies like gaps in research or conflicts in previous studies and identify any questions left from previous research.
The four major types of quality reviews include traditional or narrative literature reviews, systematic quantitative literature review, scoping reviews, and cochrane reviews. The essential components of a quality literature review are:
Introduction: provides an idea of the topic of the literature review as the main theme
Body: contains the main discussion
Conclusion: discusses what the researcher has explained
References:
Nadeem, E., Olin, S. S., Hill, L. C., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horwitz, S. M. (2013). Understanding the components of quality improvement collaboratives: a systematic literature review. The Milbank Quarterly, 91(2), 354-394.
