A- Introduction (at least 1 page of content)
In this part write a paragraph where you identify and explain specifically the problem, topic or phenomenon to be investigated.
Briefly mention the scientific foundations (principles, norms, agreements, methods, concepts, theories and laws) related to the aspect to be solved.
B – Theoretical framework applied to the problem to be solved
(at least 1/2 page of content)
Write at least two paragraphs where you identify, organize, and apply the information
scientific necessary to understand the aspect or subject of evaluation: codes, principles, norms, declarations, agreements, methods, concepts, theories and
laws (when referring to one of them write it in bold “bold” for this
be able to identify it easily and accurately in your writing). In this section you must
demonstrate the use and absolute mastery of knowledge to inform
scientifically the aspect evaluated. It is to use scientific information and relate it
with the appearance and derivatives of the problem to be solved.
In addition, you should enrich your theoretical framework with citations of information references and
data obtained from: books, journals, publications, among others (at least three sources).
You must redact or reference citations of information references as required
described in the attached document to learn how to cite sources.
C – Answer to the questions included in the work instructions
(at least 1/2 page of content).
In answering the questions you must show quality, not quantity in addition to a
high level of critical thinking. In this part you must apply the material information
of the course (codes, principles, laws, rules and norms, among others) in addition to its
knowledge and experiences to make inferences that respond to the
Questions.
1. Identify and explain the bioethical principles in public health that are
involved in the problem?
2. What principles, standards, agreements, codes and bioethical statements
Are public health related or apply in this case?
3. What options based on bioethics in public health do you think
Person mentioned in the case should have considered?
D – Discussion and analysis of results (at least 1/2 page of content)
Explain where and how codes, principles, laws, rules, and norms can be applied
of bioethics in the case studied. Argue the most significant attributes
biotics exposed in the case to integrate and combine it with knowledge
own and produce or devite several alternatives with scientific basis that serve for the
solution of the problem. It is extrapolating the findings of both sources to produce or
infer conclusions with scientific basis.
In your writing you must make citations of information references as described in
the attached document to learn how to cite sources (see below).
E – Alternatives for solving the problem (at least 1/4 page of content)
List ideas or alternatives with scientific basis and relevant to the solution
of the problem obtained in part G (above).
F – Decision making – selection of the most appropriate solution and its justification
(at least 1/4 page of content)
From the list of solutions mentioned in part E (above) select and type the
better solution to the problem. You must take into account the characteristics of the problem and
the data and information obtained from the evaluation of the data. Write and make clear
what criteria you considered to affirm or deny one idea or solution with respect to another, and
decide the best solution to the problem
G – Reflection (at least 1/2 page of content)
Write down the strengths and weaknesses about what you learned and not learned that
characterize the subject studied. Explain how what you have learned about the subject facilitates the
develop their capacities and that of others and how it contributes to forming a
just and united society
H – References
APA
